Skip to main content

Reply from Dan Rogerson

Further to my last post on the 30th August and my letter sent to the PM, DPM and Cornwall's six MPs I have received one reply from Dan Rogerson. Below it is copied and pasted to let the MP for North Cornwall to speak for himself as it were:

Dear Mr Simmons,

Thank you for the copy of your email to the Prime Minister. I am continuing to press for greater devolution to Cornwall. I have to say that I do not believe a Minister for Cornwall will help achieve this.

Best wishes

Dan Rogerson

Dan Rogerson MP

Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament for North Cornwall

ES Livrel Weriniethor a-barth Kernow Gledh

House of Commons

London, SW1A 0AA

Chi an Gemmynyon

Loundres, SW1A 0AA

Tel: 020 7219 4707

Fax: 020 7219 1018

Constituency Office

4, Tower Street, Launceston, Cornwall, PL15 8BQ

4 Stret Tour, Lannstefan, Kernow PL15 8BQ

Tel: 01566 777123

Fax: 01566 772122

Many thanks to Dan Rogerson for the first elected official to grace me with a reply. To those of us that follow Cornish politics keenly his views come as no surprise and we find on his website his arguments against a Minister for Cornwall. He argues that it deflects from the greater aim of Cornish devolution and is little more than lip service by the Tories, link. Obviously this was before the coalition so the disparaging comments about the Conservatives by himself and his colleague Stephen Gilbert would perhaps be revised now.

I do believe that a Minister for Cornwall is an important step to fixing Cornish politics and getting our voice heard at distant Westminster, but my aim in this blog was to record the replies of politicians and try to find an answer to the question: "When will we get out promised Minister for Cornwall"? As this has not been answered yet I will wait to blog more comprehensively on the subject when some kind of new information is forthcoming.

Popular posts from this blog

Why I'm voting to stay in the EU and why I think you should too

I haven't interacted much with the European Referendum campaign much. Perhaps it's because I'm too much of a political nerd and would love to see people debating the policies of the European Parliament rather than various name calling and scare mongering but anyway... There's a great deal to not like about the European Union. I'm not a defender of everything it does and the way it conducts itself. But I can say the same about a whole host of institutions and authorities. Which is why this post focuses  on a few of the things I think are important. I think the European Union is fundamentally a good idea. For 2 principle reasons, 1 the formation of the EU and greater European cooperation and understanding has led to the longest period of European peace in recorded history. If the history of Europe tells us anything then we are better off working with each other than we are fighting each other. I know that the EU will continue to exist if the UK votes to leave on th…

Meeting with Premier Inn about proposed Branwell's Mill development

As many of you will have read online and in the local papers. Premier Inn are interested in setting up a hotel in Branwell's Mill in Penzance. Last night members of the Town Council were invited to a presentation by the agents from the hotel chain in St John's Hall. The Town Council rightly has a clear position that it is neutral on this development. Due to Code of Conduct rules and particularly Section 25 of the Localism Act, councillors must not enter debates with a closed mind. Or to put in plain terms the council and councillors can not be seen to have made a decision before the meeting and before they see the facts before them of that meeting. As with any planning application in the parish of Penzance it will be reviewed, debated and voted on by Penzance Town Council  Added to the fact that I've seen a presentation for the developers but not been able to speak to hear other sides of the story. This post is primarily to inform yourselves of what is happening rather th…

Bona Vacantia, the Duchy of Cornwall, the case of the missing money

The Telegraph ran with a story about the income of the Duke of Cornwall from bona vacantia yesterday. This is when people die in Cornwall without a will or a next of kin then their possessions are deemed to be ownerless goods (the meaning of bona vacantia in Latin) and are appropriated by the Duchy of Cornwall. In England these 'goods' land, property, belongings, money and so on are appropriated by the Crown and passed over to the Treasury (i.e. the government) but in Cornwall now and since 1337 these unclaimed possessions pass to the Duchy. For centuries these assets merely became part of the heir to the English thrones fortune, but since the 1970s they have been passed to the Duchy of Cornwall's Benevolent Fund or at least that's the story. So upon reading the story I thought I'd have a quick look on the internet and see where this money went and the story of the money is very curious...

Firstly the Telegraph reports that the income to the Duchy from Cornwall'…